Saturday, July 26, 2008

Vote for Lee! She needs a job!

Lee Whitnum's 2008 Personal Financial Disclosure, filed with the House of Representatives, reveals that she is essentially unemployed.

A quick break-down of her 2007 earned income, in its totality (less than $4,200 in all):
  • $2,414 Board of Ed-- (substitute teaching)
  • $ 285 Great Stuff
  • $ 815 Home Depot
  • $ 665 First Choice Staffing

Granted another blogger points out Ms. Whitnum brought in somewhere between $10-15,000 in unearned income. But I'm curious as to how she manages to afford Greenwich on seemingly less than $20,000/year? Is Lee hypocritically living off of inherited family wealth, at the same time she labels Jim Himes, "out of touch".

The blogging community should place bets as to when the Greenwich Time, the Stamford Advocate, the Norwalk Hour, and the Connecticut Post will share with their readers and soon to be voters the following pertinent information about Ms. Whitnum:

  • 1) She’s essentially unemployed.
  • 2) The FEC has put her on notice for Failure to File her campaign finance reports. UPDATED: on Monday 7/28 Lee Whitnum filed her delinquent report, showing that she paid over $5000 to "volunteers" to help gather the 2500 signatures needed to make the ballot and force a primary.
  • 3) She spent "a couple of thousand dollars" paying canvassers to help her collect signatures, (which explains #2, she’s hiding that ugly truth.)
  • 4) In reality LeeWhitnum2008 is a one-woman show, plus a website.
  • 5) Cycle-to-date she’s raised all of $200!

How can the 4th's print media continue to report as if Ms. Whitnam has genuine support and legitimacy?

Well, as we head into the final two weeks before the August 12th primary, we must hope that the district's journalists will come to their senses and let their readers know the truth. Whitnum isn't ready to be dog-catcher, let alone handle the job of Congresswoman.

If the papers don't snap to, we may need to do a call-in campaign, directly to the editors. I mean imagine if Jim Himes or Chris Shays were cited by the FEC for failing to file their finance reports. Or if it turned out Himes resume was sheer puffery! The dailies would be all over them. I think...

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

That was exactly my point to Neil Vigdor. They would never let Shays or Himes get away with a one line sentence about FEC filing violations. Not in a million years. It would be front page above the fold news.

Anderson Scooper said...

I agree.

Look, nobody has to bury the marginal candidate. And that's not the reporter's job.

But fairly characterizing her campaign, and getting the facts out there should be a must.

These guys are guilty of seriously under-reporting what should have been a very fun story. In any case, when it comes to democracy, the press should attempt to report too much, and not too little.

Anonymous said...

Haiku


Whitnum, angry at

This and that fights the good fight;

4th District does yawn.


Richmond misses their

Warrior Goddess, but you

Have her in your midst.